美联储-揭示调查准确性——SHED与人口普查局调查结果的比较(英)

Finance and Economics Discussion SeriesFederal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C.ISSN 1936-2854 (Print)ISSN 2767-3898 (Online)Shedding Light on Survey Accuracy—A Comparison betweenSHED and Census Bureau Survey ResultsKabir Dasgupta, Fatimah Shaalan, Mike Zabek2025-010Please cite this paper as:Dasgupta, Kabir, Fatimah Shaalan, and Mike Zabek (2025). “Shedding Light on SurveyAccuracy—A Comparison between SHED and Census Bureau Survey Results ,” Financeand Economics Discussion Series 2025-010. Washington: Board of Governors of the FederalReserve System, https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2025.010.NOTE: Staff working papers in the Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS) are preliminarymaterials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analysis and conclusions set forthare those of the authors and do not indicate concurrence by other members of the research staff or theBoard of Governors. References in publications to the Finance and Economics Discussion Series (other thanacknowledgement) should be cleared with the author(s) to protect the tentative character of these papers. Shedding Light on Survey Accuracy—A Comparison between SHED and Census Bureau Survey Results Kabir Dasgupta,1 Fatimah Shaalan,2 and Mike Zabek3 February 2025 Abstract: The annual Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED) receives substantial research attention for topics related to household finances and economic well-being. To assess the reliability of data from the SHED, we compare aggregate statistics from the SHED with prominent, nationally representative surveys that use different survey designs, sample methodologies, and interview modes. Specifically, we compare recent statistics from the SHED with similar questions in U.S. Census Bureau surveys, including the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the American Community Survey (ACS). Overall, aggregate responses to the SHED benchmark well against nationally representative surveys, particularly for questions with nearly identical wording. However, we also note that subtle differences in wording of survey questions for broadly similar indicators can prompt moderate variations across data sources. Keywords: SHED; survey methodology; Census Bureau: CPS; ACS; demographic; employment; homeownership; health insurance; food insufficiency JEL Classification: C80, C81, C83 Note: The results and opinions expressed in this paper reflect the views of the authors and should not be attributed to the Federal Reserve Board or the Federal Reserve System. 1 Dasgupta (email: kabir.dasgupta@frb.gov): Senior Economist, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs (DCCA), Federal Reserve Board. 2 Shaalan (email:fatimah.j.shaalan@frb.gov): Research Assistant, DCCA, Federal Reserve Board. 3 Zabek (email: mike.zabek@frb.gov): Senior Economist, DCCA, Federal Reserve Board. 1. Introduction The Federal Reserve Board’s annual Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED) has become a widely used data sourc

立即下载
综合
2025-02-17
19页
0.44M
收藏
分享

美联储-揭示调查准确性——SHED与人口普查局调查结果的比较(英),点击即可下载。报告格式为PDF,大小0.44M,页数19页,欢迎下载。

本报告共19页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
本报告共19页,只提供前10页预览,清晰完整版报告请下载后查看,喜欢就下载吧!
立即下载
水滴研报所有报告均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
相关图表
企业对韩国出口管制政策走势的预期
综合
2025-02-17
来源:韩国营商环境报告2024
查看原文
企业对韩国技术出口管制政策的评价
综合
2025-02-17
来源:韩国营商环境报告2024
查看原文
2024 年 7 月韩国国家核心技术新指定情况
综合
2025-02-17
来源:韩国营商环境报告2024
查看原文
企业认为能否公平享受韩国绿色转型优惠政策
综合
2025-02-17
来源:韩国营商环境报告2024
查看原文
企业认为韩国绿色领域隐性壁垒变化情况
综合
2025-02-17
来源:韩国营商环境报告2024
查看原文
企业认为韩国绿色经济环境存在的问题
综合
2025-02-17
来源:韩国营商环境报告2024
查看原文
回顶部
报告群
公众号
小程序
在线客服
收起